Most millennials hate the thought of leaving a voicemail, especially when it's to a love interest. Now, scientists say they have good reason.

　　大多數(shù)千禧一代不喜歡語(yǔ)音留言，尤其不喜歡給喜歡的人發(fā)語(yǔ)音�，F(xiàn)在，科學(xué)家說(shuō)這的確有些道理。

　　A new study has found Facebook messages and emails are more likely to get you a date than a simple phone call. This contradicts previous research that claims email and text messages can lack emotion.

　　一項(xiàng)新的研究表明，與一個(gè)普通電話(huà)相比，在Facebook發(fā)信息或發(fā)郵件更可能給你帶來(lái)一場(chǎng)約會(huì)。這種觀點(diǎn)與之前一項(xiàng)研究結(jié)果相悖，該研究認(rèn)為郵件和短信缺少人情味。

　　'The bottom line is that email is much better when you want to convey some information that you want someone to think about,' said one of the authors, Alan Dennis from Indiana University. Dennis and co-author Taylor Wells, an assistant professor at California State University-Sacramento, wanted to learn more about how we respond emotionally to emails.

　　印第安納大學(xué)(Indiana University)的艾倫丹尼斯(Alan Dennis)是該研究的一位作者。他說(shuō)，“最重要的是，當(dāng)你想表達(dá)一些希望引起別人思考的信息時(shí)，發(fā)郵件會(huì)更適合�！绷硪晃蛔髡呤莵�(lái)自加州州立大學(xué)-薩克拉門(mén)托分校(California State University-Sacramento)的助理教授泰勒韋爾斯(Taylor Wells)，他和丹尼斯想深入了解人們對(duì)于郵件情緒上的反應(yīng)。

　　In a study of 72 teenagers, scientists found that people who sent romantic emails were more emotionally aroused and used stronger and more thoughtful language than those who left voicemails.

　　在一項(xiàng)針對(duì)72個(gè)青少年的研究中，科學(xué)家發(fā)現(xiàn)，與語(yǔ)音留言的人相比，發(fā)送浪漫郵件的人會(huì)投入更多感情，使用更加強(qiáng)烈、意味深長(zhǎng)的語(yǔ)言。

　　The research was conducted by placing skin sensors on the subjects' faces to measure muscle movement associated with positive and negative emotion, and on their feet to measure arousal. Subjects were randomly chosen to do voicemail or email and to either produce a practical or a romantic message.

　　研究通過(guò)在研究對(duì)象的臉上放置皮膚傳感器檢測(cè)其對(duì)于積極、消極情感的肌肉反應(yīng)，在腳上放置皮膚傳感器測(cè)量其興奮度。該研究隨機(jī)挑選研究對(duì)象，讓他們發(fā)送實(shí)用或是浪漫的語(yǔ)音信息或郵件。

　　'When writing romantic emails, senders consciously or subconsciously added more positive content to their messages, perhaps to compensate for the medium's inability to convey vocal tone,' Dennis and Wells wrote in the paper. 'Email enables senders to modify the content as messages are composed to ensure they are crafted to the needs of the situation. Voicemail lacks this feature,' they added. 'A sender records a voicemail in a single take, and it can be sent or discarded and re-recorded, but not edited. [This means] senders engage with email messages longer and may think about the task more deeply than when leaving voicemails. This extra processing may increase arousal.'

　　兩位作者在研究報(bào)告中寫(xiě)道，“寫(xiě)浪漫郵件時(shí)，發(fā)件人有意識(shí)或下意識(shí)地在信息里添加積極的內(nèi)容，或許是彌補(bǔ)無(wú)法傳遞聲音的不足�！彼麄冄a(bǔ)充道，“發(fā)郵件時(shí)可以修改內(nèi)容，保證內(nèi)容符合情境。而語(yǔ)音信息做不到這一點(diǎn)，發(fā)語(yǔ)音時(shí)，一次只能一口氣說(shuō)完，語(yǔ)音內(nèi)容只能發(fā)送、舍棄或是重錄，無(wú)法修改。這也意味著發(fā)郵件時(shí)投入的精力更多，相較于發(fā)語(yǔ)音，他們會(huì)思考得深入，這種額外的加工處理或許增加情感�！�

　　The use of email induced more arousing psychophysiological responses than voicemail, regardless of whether the message was practical or romantic. The study found the results held true for both men and women.

　　無(wú)論是實(shí)用信息還是浪漫信息，發(fā)郵件都比發(fā)語(yǔ)音信息更能引起生理和心理上的反應(yīng)。研究結(jié)果對(duì)男女同樣適用。

　　The findings run counter to something known as 'media naturalness theory', a commonly held evolutionary standard suggesting that the further we get away from face-to-face communications, the less natural and less effective it becomes.

　　這些發(fā)現(xiàn)與所謂的“媒介自然性理論”相悖�！懊浇樽匀恍岳碚摗笔且环N通常認(rèn)可的發(fā)展標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，該標(biāo)準(zhǔn)認(rèn)為與人交流時(shí)隔得距離越遠(yuǎn)，交流越不自然且越低效。

　　The researchers, however, did not see much use of emoticons and emojis in their emails. Rather, they found that when writing emails, subjects took more time to choose their words carefully to make sure the language conveyed the full meaning.

　　但是，研究者發(fā)現(xiàn)郵件中并沒(méi)有使用太多情感符號(hào)與表情文字。他們發(fā)現(xiàn)實(shí)驗(yàn)對(duì)象會(huì)花更多時(shí)間斟酌用詞，確保言盡其意。

　　Dennis warns people against misinterpreting these findings to suggest that face-to-face meetings, personal phone calls and other direct forms of communications aren't as useful.

　　丹尼斯告誡人們不要理解錯(cuò)誤研究發(fā)現(xiàn)，并不是說(shuō)面對(duì)面的交流，打電話(huà)等直接溝通方式?jīng)]有用。

　　'If something isn't really clear and you want to make sure that everyone has the same understanding of what something means, that's best done in phone calls, face-to-face meetings or video conferencing,' Dennis said.

　　丹尼斯說(shuō)，“如果有些事不清楚，而你希望確保大家都理解你想表達(dá)的意思，最好還是打電話(huà)、面對(duì)面交流，或是視頻通話(huà)。”

　　The study has been accepted for publication in the journal Computers in Human Behavior.

　　這項(xiàng)研究已經(jīng)獲準(zhǔn)在期刊《計(jì)算機(jī)與人類(lèi)行為》(Computers in Human Behavior)發(fā)表。